SCN’s Research Funding Overview

As an outstanding research community dedicated to powering life-saving therapies and technologies for the benefit of Canadians, the Stem Cell Network aims to foster made-in-Canada RM therapies and technologies that will ignite global science advancements and therapeutic and technological innovations. Equally, we aim to build Canada’s international reputation for translational research excellence and expertise that will continue driving regenerative medicine into the clinic — creating access to state-of-the-art therapies for tomorrow’s patients.

Over the course of the 2022–2025 period, two peer-reviewed funding competitions will be held to identify the research projects to be funded. The first kicked off in September 2021 and offers two- and three-year awards. The second, launched September 1, 2022 and offers 22 month awards. SCN anticipates supporting approximately 50 research projects — including clinical trials.

SCN’s Peer Review Process

To ensure the research projects and clinical trials SCN funds align with our strategic mandate, SCN employs a two-stage peer review process that first evaluates the scientific excellence of an application and then assesses the strategic fit with our mandate and contractual obligations to the Government of Canada:

  • Stage one: Applications are evaluated to identify scientifically excellent research that will further the field, is novel and will ensure Canada continues to have international impact within the area of regenerative medicine. The evaluation of the scientific merit of an application is performed by SCN’s international peer review committees, comprising international subject matter experts drawn from academia and industry. For the 2022 funding competition, four international peer review committees were utilised: the Translational Research Committee, the Policy Review Committee, the International Scientific Advisory Board and the Early Career Research Committee. The peer reviewers who served on these committees in 2022 are listed here.
  • Stage two: A strategic evaluation of highly ranked peer reviewed applications is conducted by SCN’s Research Management Committee (RMC). The RMC is responsible for considering how each potential project aligns with SCN’s mandate, budget needs, partner support, project potential for clinical and/or commercial translation, HQP training, knowledge mobilization, and the fostering of equity, diversity and inclusion within the multi-disciplinary research team.

Based on the Stage one scientific peer review and the Stage two strategic evaluation, the RMC and SCN Management make project funding recommendations for approval by SCN’s Board of Directors.

SCN uses a Continual Review process for all projects approved by SCN’s Board of Directors to ensure a research project’s milestones and deliverables are being met and that SCN funds are appropriately invested. Continual Review is conducted by the RMC, which offers insight and direction in reviewing the annual project progress reports. The RMC may also directly meet with investigators to better understand the nuances of their research so investigators receive the best possible feedback and support.

List of 2022 peer reviewers